5 Weekly Research Journal Entries

Overview

The journal entries are simultaneously a reflective exercise and a formative assessment.

  • Reflective exercise: You will be submitting weekly research journal entries or logs showing your progress on the efficiency and effectiveness of your research process, your progress on finding and analyzing research results, and your ability to reflect on your weekly progress toward your individual research goals. The weekly journal/log also documents the information you need to complete the assigned course projects.
  • Formative assessment: Throughout the research process, you should receive substantive feedback on the work you are doing. This feedback allows you to learn from mistakes, improve research strategies, and exercise your metacognitive skills. Instructors will provide personalized feedback on each of your journal entries so that you continue to improve throughout the course.

Format 

The form/platform for the journal entries is up to you. You can do a video entry, a blog, a text document, substantive chart, or a diagram. Consider your audience; make your journal easy to read and understand for both you and the reader (i.e. a supervising attorney or colleague).

Substance

Journal entries/logs should include:

  • an explanation of research process, including steps taken to navigate databases and commentary on the reliability/usability of the research database or platform;
  • research results related to the week’s subject focus (i.e. if we are covering secondary sources during that week, your journal entry should focus on the secondary sources you found), including evidence that you read and analyzed the material in that source (a summary or explanation) and citations to other legal sources that you found in the source and plan on investigating further;
  • a reflective element demonstrating your thinking about your progress toward short and long-term research goals, new techniques you learned, new resources you encountered.

sample Rubric: Weekly journal entry grading rubric

Grade Description of  Student Work
Excellent (5 points)
  • Journal entry discusses research results found – results are thorough and reflect the weekly module material. Results show creativity and expansive thinking as well as varied use of tools.
  • Journal entry thoroughly explains research process and summarizes research results with consideration of effective communication to a specific audience.
  • Journal entry shows reflection on thoroughness and efficiency, as well as growth as a legal researcher.
Good (4 points)
  • Journal entry discusses research results found – results reflect weekly module material but may not reflect a thorough approach or use of a variety of tools.
  • Journal entry provides an explanation of research process and results.
  • Journal entry shows basic self-reflection on new research techniques and knowledge.
Satisfactory (3 points)
  • Journal entry discusses research results found – results are incomplete as compared to weekly module material and reflect minimal use of tools and approaches.
  • Journal entry provides a basic or incomplete explanation of research process and results.
  • Journal entry provides little self-reflection.
Below Professional Expectations (1-2 points)
  • Journal entry discussion of research results is incomplete as compared to weekly module material and lacks explanation of uses of tools and approaches.
  • Journal entry provides little or no explanation of research process or results.
  • Journal entry provides no self-reflection.

Sample Journal Prompt (This is a sample prompt for the first journal entry)

Your first journal entry will be a statement of your research goals and a reflection on your current starting point (what are your strengths, weaknesses, challenges, concerns, etc.) as well as a discussion that you have done this week on secondary sources. Every weekly journal entry should (1) explain the research that you done in relation to the sources that we are covering during the week (i.e. this week we are talking about secondary sources), (2) discuss platforms, resources, websites, or other tools you used, and (3) reflect on your development as an effective researcher (did you discover something new? become more efficient? become better at creating effective searches?) You can use any form you like: a text document, a video, a visual chart, or diagram.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Advanced Legal Research: Process and Practice Copyright © by Megan Austin is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book